in process …


Something bad happened. You should try to fix …


The action is completed.

The learning route will lead to the ideal outcome.

Unless specifically noted, the information in this document is not a Susan Harwood Training Grant requirement however, the information has been shown to yield results and it suggested that you incorporate as much of it as possible into your training program.

But could the parents be wrong? A major study to be published on Wednesday will conclude that there is no evidence that children achieve more at single-sex schools. Fifty years of research into the subject does not support the &aposbold claims&apos made by the heads of these schools. The report, by one of Britain&aposs leading education Professor Alan Smithers, will challenge the popular perception among parents that sending their children (in particular daughters) to a single-sex school will benefit them. &aposThere are n

He concludes that, despite there being no advantage to single-sex schools, there appears to be no disadvantage either. In some cases single-sex education will be preferable if the community demands it for cultural reasons. &aposThe best outcome is to have a variety,&apos said Smithers, who will present his findings at the Co-Education Conference on Wednesday at Wellington College in Berkshire.

The above is a list of &aposperformance criteria&apos by which we might assess our professional development skills. However, what is from the list is the route by which we might achieve these objectives. It is suggested that a five step approach is used: There are many ways to categorize learning styles, but the simplest places learners into one or more of three categories:

Related links


single schools education smithers training