The question is how smart does the screener need to be to explain these findings? No scientist today believes in a Freudian unconscious, complete with its own quirks and urges, scheming to delude the conscious mind. The today is understood as a vast store of knowledge, habits, and associations that help process information efficiently rather than waiting in the queue for slower conscious thinking. To explain selective selectivity, the unconscious screener be able to do at least two things. First, it has to
@Davidlpf: “…”? Do you have even the idea what you’re talking about? (No, we don’t need to know your answer to that. )
When people want to lose weight, I tell them to weigh themselves a month. On a daily basis, they should ignore the scale and judge themselves solely by whether they followed their diet and did their workout.There’s a growing trend on the internet of people writing essays that basically say “I suck at something, but that’s okay and I love myself.” The authors will talk about how they struggled with their weight, lack of social skills, or go-nowhere career, but then stopped trying to change and starte
Neuroscience. Evolution. Health. Chemistry. Physics. Technology.
T. S. Eliot said it No one will ever give you permission to live your dreams.
Everything makes more sense with an illustration. Highlight and example, illustrate an ideal customer avatar, or tell a specific instance of a problem you had. Setting the context and the stage (that seems obvious to you, the writer), makes it easier for people to understand the pain point, the context, and the reason why writing. When people can see your story–who you are, where you come from, why you’re doing what you’re doing–it’s easier for them to become a part of it.